Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Why is there so much opposition to ending birthright citizenship?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wow, the United States finally joins the rest of the world in 2025 where citizenship requires at least one parent be a citizen. Way to go with common sense USA. Birthright citizenship as it was previously done was nutso. [/quote] Sorry, but this EO is unconstitutional. If you don't like the Fourteenth Amendment, then propose an amendment to change it.[/quote] Scotus will uphold it [/quote] The mother and father's citizenship and status are not on the birth certificate. This is going to create thousands, millions of stateless babies. When we need all the people we can get, as we approach population decline.[/quote] I’m ambivalent on this… It won’t hold in the courts. If Republicans want to take action on this, they can try to amend the constitution. However, good luck getting 2/3s of both houses and 3/4 of state legislatures to pass this. Also, to be clear, these babies would not be stateless. They would receive the citizenship of their parents’ home country. It’s called jus sanguini-citizenship through the blood[/quote] Not every country has jus sanguinis, or straightforward jus sanguinis. Relative to the biases noted in this thread, for example, India and China do not have straightforward jus sanguinis.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics