Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump's defenders cling to two atarguments: [b]1 - the President of the United States is not an "officer"; and [/b] 2- He's never been convicted Both arguments are complete BS and fly in the face of logic and jurisprudence[/quote] The 14th amendment, Section 3 also includes "or hold any office, civil or military..." The Office of the President is most definitely an office. So whether you consider him an officer or not, the 14th amendment would not allow Trump to hold the office of the President.[/quote] Not to give the argument to much credence, but I think it is more focused on the other part of section 3, where the disqualification only applies to anyone "who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States." So basically they are saying that the oath he took as president was not as "an officer of the United States" and therefore doesn't count. However, the oath of the dogcatcher would count. Because that makes total sense.[/quote] Haha. Yes. Makes no sense at all that we'd bar him from being a deputy postmaster but it's totally o.k. to let the insurrectionist be President. And to reach that conclusion, you have to decide that person holding the office of President isn't an officer of the United States. That said, I wouldn't be at all surprised if the "textualists" on the Supreme Court decided that the Constitution really meant "an officer of the United States except for the office of President" where the exception is written in invisible ink. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics