Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/baldwin_daniel_/status/1691896568289304666[/twitter][/quote]

Yeah, I don’t know what she was thinking.  Smith did it the right way and narrowed it to Trump to get the best chance possible for a speedy trial.  She guaranteed hers will take years when she indicted so many people and charged RICO.  Dumb move.[/quote]

What dumb move?  This isn't a political trial.  It's a criminal trial.  They take as long as they take.  [/quote]

Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.[/quote]

That is uncharted waters. No one really seems to know the answer to whether a sitting president can be tried in state court for crimes committed prior to becoming the president.[/quote]

No it isn't.  There's absolutely zero legitimate legal reason I am aware of anywhere, why a sitting President can't be tried in court for matters not covered under scope of their presidential duties.  Presidential immunity/absolute immunity/qualified immunity only applies to actions that happened as part of official duties.  [/quote]

Maybe because the president can’t carry out his duties if he’s focused on  a trial or in prison. The Supreme Court would never let this happen.  Get real.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics