Reply to Queen Elizabeth II

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Queen Elizabeth II"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Also are her and William even together? It’s incredibly bizarre that she’s not with the rest of the family and also wasn’t at the Diana statute unveiling. It’s like every event that is important to William she’s MIA. [/quote]

She was also not at the Diana statue unveiling. Maybe pass that because it’s public but why wouldn’t you be with your husband with his grandmother dying? Sophie and Camilla were there.[/quote]

Because the Queen was already dead and they had just dropped the children off for the first day of school. She needed to be there to pick them up and be with them for all of the stuff that is about to follow. With the exception of William and Harry - who were/were now about to be the children of a King — no other grandchildren or great-grandchildren were there. It’s not nefarious - this is part of a very-long planned out national event which it sounds like moved very quickly and didn’t have as much notice as people had presumed would happen.[/quote]
Sophie and Edward also have minor children. If they were already dropped off that makes even less sense as seems super easy to have Nanny Maria pick them up. It’s not like his grandmother dies every day seems kind of unhealthy to decline to be supportive for even one day for a school run. Either she didn’t care to go or he didn’t want her there. [/quote]

Or there were already plans and protocols in place that involved the Queen's children and the children of the incoming Monarch.[/quote]

+1. I doubt that Kate had any personal choice in the events of the day.[/quote]

Exactly.  And thing of the optics if she were allowed to go and someone else was told to stay away.  [/quote]

It was initially announced that Megan was going and then it was announced that she wasn’t going and the announcement referenced the fact that Kate wasn’t going, either. Whether Kate stayed because she wanted to drop her kids at their first full day of school or because she was told not to come, it gave Meghan an excuse not to go herself. [/quote]

This is not how it worked.

Harry and Meghan's spokespeople said they were both going. The clearly hadn't cleared that with the palace though because then they said in fact just Harry will go. THere was no official announcement about Meghan not going bc of Kate- that came from some reporter on twiitter who is a Meghan stan and obsessed with Kate vis a vis Meghan.[/quote]

It was from Omid Scobie, who is the mouthpiece for Meghan and Harry when they know they’re not supposed to be talking. It was revealed in court that  Meghan fed him information for his biography. He’s always got the H&M spin. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics