Reply to Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Regarding Obama weighing in on the Flynn decision........

Barack Obama on Michael Flynn
The lawyer President misstates the crime and the real threat to justice.

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EXvB_2lXkAEox7a?format=png&name=900x900[/img]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/barack-obama-on-michael-flynn-11589148648

[/quote]

Obama is in CYA mode. That includes trying to discredit Barr.[/quote]
Exactly.[/quote]

Except others who were directly involved have said their words were used out of context to draw the wrong conclusion. So, not exactly.

I guess that's why the judge wants briefs, from those who were involved, to clarify the DOJ document.[/quote]

At least this will allow those who wanted to file amicus briefs in the past, in support of Flynn, and were denied, to now be able to file them.[/quote]

Sure. Knock yourself out. Support Flynn.

What's your legal argument? [/quote]

See the Ted Stevens case.[/quote]

IOW, you don't have a legal argument.

Why do you support Flynn? Is he a family member or friend? [/quote]

Prosecutorial misconduct is unacceptable.  That is my legal argument.  I don't care whether it is Flynn, Stevens, or Duke lacrosse players.  It is wrong.[/quote]

Shea's motion was pretty awful. Is it misconduct? Maybe.

I doubt that's what you're referring to though.  You're probably stuck on the "missing 302" nonsense or possibly Mifsud's posthumous phone contents.[/quote]

In February of 2018, the Judge ordered the prosecution to provide all exculpatory evidence to Flynn.  He ordered it sua sponte.  They were supposed to provide it during plea negotiations.  It took them over 2 years from the date of his order, to provide it.[/quote]

+100
And, in the end, the prosecution were not the ones that provided it. 
A separate investigator did.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics