Reply to Epstein Files

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Epstein Files"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The MAGA  claim that Biden and Garland “weaponized” the DOJ against Trump isn’t supported by evidence. In fact, Garland took an unusually cautious, norm-restoring approach designed to avoid political influence. Biden publicly refused to pressure DOJ even when it hurt him politically; and Garland consistently insulated sensitive cases by relying on career prosecutors, grand juries, and eventually a Special Counsel. That is the opposite of how a politicized justice system behaves.

The major cases against Trump did not originate with Biden or Garland. The Mar-a-Lago documents case began with the National Archives and a grand jury subpoena; the Jan. 6 investigation started from the bottom up, driven by thousands of rioter cases handled by career staff; Georgia and New York prosecutions were state-level and outside DOJ control. Meanwhile, the Biden DOJ prosecuted Democrats like Sen. Menendez and Rep. Cuellar, undermining the claim that only Republicans were targeted.

Key points that debunk the “weaponization” narrative:

Biden refused to direct DOJ actions and stayed silent on Trump and Hunter Biden cases.

Garland slow-walked decisions to avoid political timing and appointed an independent Special Counsel.

All Trump-related federal cases were driven by evidence gathered by career investigators and grand juries, not political appointees.

DOJ also charged Democrats, contradicting any idea of partisan targeting.

In short, the record actually shows a Biden/Garland DOJ trying hard not to be political. while the charges against Trump stem from his own conduct, not from any presidential pressure.[/quote]

Too bad Lisa Monaco wasnt[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics