Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Murch moving to lafayette "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For those who have not been to Murch and are not aware of the scale of the project and the compact nature of the site, swinging on site might indeed seem reasonable as many other schools have done this, including Lafayette. However, the Lafayette site and others include a reasonable amount of play space away from the construction area whereas the students at Murch would be confined to a smaller space with no abutting play space for twice the amount of time. [/quote] To put this in perspective: Lafayette sits on something like 7 acres abutting another 7 acre public playground and park; Murch is on 3 acres, and they have the same number of students (Murch is 4 classrooms smaller). In fact, [b]the area that Lafayette's trailers are using is just about the same size as Murch's entire lot without construction[/b]. Imagine Patterson cuts all the way through Lafayette, and there is no playground on the other side, and the current Lafayette building site is housing. So your current trailers on the baseball field are now your permanent school and that is all the land you have (this will equal the size of Murch). Move all your roads in to flank the baseball fields -- that is the size of the Murch block (note the difference this makes to parking and drop off zones -- and no parking or stopping allowed on one long side (Reno)). Now, imagine they are going to build a building for 750 students on that trailer city site (which is great news). The building will take up all the land except for one acre that will be left for playground. But, while they build there, your 600+ children will also still go to school on the same site. Some of the trailers you have now will be replaced by expensive double deckers, and they will put a fence 45-90 feet away to protect your kids from the pit they are digging where one of the the baseball diamonds was and the cranes and equipment that will erect the building. The children will play in the 45-90-foot space between the classrooms and the construction equipment in shifts (DCPS said this is less than their minimum standard, but the best they can do). Also, no cafeteria (nothing new for Murch), so the children will have very minimal time outside the trailer classrooms. For two years, your 4-11 year old children will be sharing that flat, 3-acre space with excavation and construction. That is what Murch is facing with the on site option. And we understand if you now say, gosh, I had no idea the Murch site was so small. We don't like the Lafayette option and it has a host of issues, so put those arguments forward. But do not argue that the Murch on site option is the same as what Lafayette has had this year. It is not even close to comparable to what Lafayette has had swinging on its 7 acre site (though I'm sure it hasn't been pleasant) with a lovely public playground at its disposal. Lafayette's swing site is a luxury by comparison (actually, it is a luxury compared to what Murch kids have now, but that's beside the point). In fact, even with both schools on site, there would be as much space per child as Murch has now (before construction). Lafayette is just used to having more. Hoping for UDC to come through.[/quote] While I completely agree it looks good on papern, a very small portion of the 7 acres belongs to the school. The rest is city property, with a playground that very clearly cannot withstand the heavy use it is getting with just one school, part of which is used to walk dogs, and not suitable for play, and much of which will be taken up by the school itself, which was expanded in size and scope in order to be able to take 150 students from Murch. The very narrow streets which are heavily used to commute are also not suitable for 1400 kids plus teachers, etc. There is no way both schools can use the play area - recess will have to be staggered one week for one school, one week for the other or something similar. Anyone who has actually seen the site understands the problems immediately. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics