Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Common Core's epic fail: Special Education"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]"it's too much to expect young kids to think critically" - in other words, let's not expect too much thinking from our kids. The CC standards for K-2 for critical thinking is designed for kids in that age group. My 6 yr old DC can meet the standards designed for a 1st grader. Some of it is hard for DC, so we are working on it. But I think it's great that DC is learning to think critically earlier on than later.[/quote] I have seen no complaints about expecting young kids to think critically. I have seen complaints about expecting young kids to understand some math functions for which they are not ready. There is a big difference there. [/quote] It's also about thinking concretely as opposed to abstractly. Common Core push the demands for abstract thought down to ages where it's developmentally inappropriate. Young kids are concrete thinkers. [/quote] [b]What about the standards for K-2 require abstract thinking?[/b] If I think about all the HW my 1st grade has had, they require concrete but critical thinking. Example, for math: John has 10 apples; Sue has 8 apples. How many apples are there in total? For writing: Is this a good title for the book...use examples and details from the book. Using details from the book is concrete, not abstract.[/quote] PP, in my experience, it's a waste of time to ask this question. The dialogue (if it is a dialogue) goes like this: anti-CC poster: The Common Core is too wordy/easy/hard/abstract/inappropriate/unnecessary/time-wasting/bad. poster who does not hate the CC: Could you give an example of a standard you find too wordy/easy/hard/abstract/inappropriate/unnecessary/time-wasting/bad? anti-CC poster response #1: I'm not going to play your little games. Go look for yourself! anti-CC poster response #2: You again? anti-CC poster response #3: Go read other threads. There are plenty of examples. anti-CC poster response #4: *links to an article about the Common Core that does not reference any standard* anti-CC poster response #5: The specific standards are irrelevant, because the whole idea is bad to begin with. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics