Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law. The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative. [/quote] Hur made no diagnosis. He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now. And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve. Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality. [/quote] It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself. [/quote] He had to include them because that was his excuse for not charging him. [/quote] The report explained that there were no charges because of lack of evidence of knowledge or intent. His speech relating his personal animosity for Biden was irrelevant and unprofessional. [/quote] Please pay attention. 'Lack of evidence of knowledge or intent' means Joe is senile so he doesn't remember period. What is so hard to understand about that? He definitely was not senile when he was in the Senate so Biden should have been charged for the classified documents he took when he was a senator.[/quote] Dp- bulls—t Hur couldn’t find evidence and in fact in the report states he did find evidence in the affirmative, that there was no intent. He didn’t have the goods, so insulted the president on behalf of MAGA land[/quote] Explain the beginning of his report..... "Mr. Biden willfully retained marked classified documents about Afghanistan and unmarked classified handwritten notes in his notebook, both of which he stored in unsecured places in his home." "Willfully" means: 1.with the intention of causing harm; deliberately. 2. with a stubborn and determined intention to do as one wants, regardless of the consequences. How is this not "with intent" or not proof. Hur chose the word "willfully" for a reason. Please stop the gaslighting. [/quote] Anonymous Relevant excerpts from The Real “Robert Hur Report” (Versus What You Read in the News) How the Special Counsel report has been misinterpreted by Andrew Weissmann and Ryan Goodman February 10, 2024 “We have concluded that there is not a prosecutable case against Biden. Although there was a basis to open the investigation based on the fact that classified documents were found in Biden’s homes and office space, that is insufficient to establish a crime was committed. The illegal retention or dissemination of national defense information requires that he knew of the existence of such documents and that he knew they contained national defense information. It is not a crime without those additional elements. Our investigation, after a thorough year-long review, concludes that there is an absence of such necessary proof. Indeed, we have found a number of innocent explanations as to which we found no contrary evidence to refute them and found affirmative evidence in support of them.” 1. Lack of Evidence of Knowledge that Information Was Classified * “Mr. Biden should have known that by reading his unfiltered notes about classified meetings in the Situation Room, he risked sharing classified information with his ghostwriter. But the evidence does not show that when Mr. Biden shared the specific passages with his ghostwriter, Mr. Biden knew the passages were classified and intended to share classified information.” (p. 9-10) 2. [b]Lack of Evidence of Willful Retention * “Some of the documents in these files were marked classified, though, because of the passage of time, we do not know whether Mr. Biden willfully retained the classified documents or consulted[/b] 3. Lack of Evidence of Willful Disclosure * “[[b]W]e conclude that the evidence does not establish that Mr. Biden willfully disclosed national defense information to Zwonitzer.” (p. 248[/b]) 4. Lack of Evidence of Transportation of Documents * “We were unable to determine how the marked classified Afghanistan documents got from the White House, where Mr. Biden possessed them as vice president in 2009, to his Delaware home, where they were found in 2022 …. Ultimately, we could not determine precisely when the box containing the Afghanistan documents got into the garage, or who put the documents there.” (p. 150) 5. Lack of Evidence of Possession The Hur report centers on one of the apparently most incriminating statements by Biden to his ghostwriter. While in his home in Virginia. Biden said he had “just found all the classified stuff downstairs.” 6. Evidence of Intent to Return Classified Documents Around the same time as the relevant period, Biden proactively returned other classified documents to government authorities that he discovered in his home. The report notes this evidence supports Biden’s innocence.[/quote] Oh, please. I have no interest in the take of the very partisan Andrew Weissmann. He told his ghostwriter that he found the classified documents. That indicates knowledge and willful retention. [/quote] Really? You have no interest in hearing from someone with a life time of relevant experience and who provided detailed quotes and page numbers for every point made? https://www.justsecurity.org/92090/the-real-robert-hur-report-versus-what-you-read-in-the-news/[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
