Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is probably what the SCOTUS will do as well...wait for the ballots on the general election. [twitter]https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1740012599557914874[/twitter][/quote] I doubt that. I think they will rule earlier rather than later and that ruling will be that states cannot prevent Trump (or any other candidate) from being on the ballot. There has been no charge of insurrection and no finding of insurrection in a court of law. It really is that simple. [/quote] This isn't a criminal matter, so there doesn't need to be a criminal charge. This is a finding of fact that the defendant "engaged" in an insurrection, and a court, after a 5 day hearing with witnesses, a defense and no dispute of facts, found that the defendant did, in fact, engage in an insurrection and as such, was not eligible to appear on a state ballot for office, pursuant to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, Article 3. What you have posted is not, in fact, a part of the Amendment, but rather a newly conjured requirement that is beyond the plain text and understanding of, and intention behind, the Amendment to the Constitution.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics