Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I love the people attacking Hutchinson like she's as liberal as AOC. LOLOL. She was part of the inner circle MAGA, a$$hats. She's only being attacked now b/c you don't like what she has to say. [/quote] She is being attacked because she is a well rehearsed probably paid liberal shill to embellish what she thinks she heard. If she lied about lunging for the car wheel, just imagine what else she is lying about. [/quote] A paid liberal shill who worked for Steve Scalise and then was an aide to Mark Meadows and worked 50 feet away from Trump's oval office. Maybe you could undermine your credibility a little more?[/quote] She was recruited by the left and her testimony was well rehearsed. Cannot wait to find records of payments she received. Lying to congress is a felony. Wonder how she will look in Orange. It is the new black you know![/quote] You must have absolutely nothing factual at all to use a legitimate defense if this is what your trying to spin! Haha![/quote] +1 [b]She killed any chance she had at a career in R politics after this. Why on EARTH would she just make all of this up AND risk a felony charge? [/b] I am pretty sure the only reason she was testifying prior to this was because she feared jail time. And my best guess of why they had her testify yesterday was because one of the witnesses being intimidated by these mob style "loyalty" notes was her.[/quote] You are dumb. Very dumb. There's an entire landscape of Republicans behind the scenes that want Trump gone. We've heard it for years. The goal here is to wrest control of the party back to relatively normal Republican ideals. The trick is getting rid pf Trump without attacking him and alienating the base. What Liz Cheney has been promised in the future for becoming the face of this movement, I don't know. But you are very naive if you think this is some random staffer coming forward without assurances that she has a future. [/quote] I'm not the poster you responded to, and I know a lot of Republicans want to wrest their party away from Trump, but they've been trying since the 2016 Presidential campaign, and so far it hasn't worked well, has it? I DO NOT believe this staffer, Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, or any other Republican involved in these hearings were promised anything, or are motivated by anything except wanting to tell their truth and try to persuade others that this Jan 6th event was planned by Trump and could have had ended in a successful coup. Which is why so many people REFUSED to testify - there's too much to lose, too little to gain, for a lot of them. We can only hope that after these hearings, Trump will be damaged to the point where he cannot run again. That's my hope. I don't torture myself by hoping for any criminal investigation or jail time - it's not coming. He'll live out his life in Florida, whining on his deathbed that he won the 2020 election. [/quote] I'm the PP and let me be clear, I don't think the motivation of Liz Cheney, Kinzinger, or Cassidy Hutchinson is purely transactional. I think they are also doing this because they believe it's the right thing to do. But I also don't believe it's happening in a vacuum. There's a person or people behind the scenes working on the people they can get to tell their stories to tell them. Cassidy Hutchinson didn't just switch lawyers on her own.[/quote] Her first lawyer was coup-adjacent. It’s possible that some of his advice wasn’t in her best interest.[/quote] She wasn't going to be protected. She should have known that when Meadows requested a pardon for himself but not her.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics