Reply to FCV ECNL

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "FCV ECNL"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How many good coaches really are there at loudon, mclean, Braddock road, and vda?

how many of the ecnl coaches are actually good at developing players versus simply recruiting[/quote]

This is the golden question. I think there are some coaches that are better than others at developing tactics but I don't know if ECNL coaches spend much time at personal or technical development. Its like enrolling in an advanced writing class and expecting the teacher to train you on proper grammar. The reality is that you are expected to have that base before you take the class. The sign of a good coach is if he has trained a player from a young age and that player is recognized by next-level coaches (DI, YNT scouts, Pro-scouts). I know that Pipeline has two players invited to the YNT camp and both trained under their current coach since u9. That is the only example I know of where a coach has been working with a younger player from the beginning. The coaches at McLean and MUFC have a great track-record of teaching tactics but the players they get usually come in at u15/u16.

[/quote]
How can you say MUFC coaches have a great track record? Not one team is considered good.[/quote]

I am not an expert but when recent classes, including the current graduating class, include commits to WVU Vandy, UMD, Yale, Dartmouth, Tenn, OSU, etc. and you have alumni playing in NWSL or on the the WNT, you must be doing something right.

[/quote]
I see. MUFC meaning Maryland United? Thinking MUFC is Metro United.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics