Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Kobe Bryant killed in helicopter crash (per TMZ)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If the woman had not been so bloodied and injured, this would have been a case of he said/she said. Thankfully, her injuries were significant and horrific enough that he would have been convicted of rape and had to settle.[/quote] She was not bloodied and injured, that is misinformation. If you read the hearing transcript from the detective, it is very informative. He testifies based on his interview with the sexual assault nurse and the written examination report provided by the sexual assault nurse. For almost every single body part and genital part - it is is marked as no trauma observed. The report notes two areas of injury - one very small (1 cm x 2 cm bruise) on the jawline, and pinpoint microscopic tears on the posterior fourchette. The tears were not visible to the naked eye but were visible under microscope and with dye. There were also two 1 cm lacerations visible under microscope. There were no other injuries noted. There was minor redness noted in two regions (one external and one internal). There was no treatment or intervention recommended (no creams or any follow up). During the hearing the detective testifies that he did not read the written report closely as he does not have a good understanding of female genitalia and didn't understand what he was reading. He repeats this a few times as he doesn't know the names for the various parts of the genitals that he is being asked questions about. He says that during his interview with the sexual assault nurse she told him that the tears could be consistent with "penetrating genital trauma". Nowhere does it say it was caused by non consensual sex. The nurse is not called to testify as to her expertise with regard to knowledge of injuries with consensual vs non consensual sex or with regards to the timeline when these injuries might have occurred (the victim also had sex a day or two before the alleged assault). Since the nurse didn't testify, the detective was working from his interview and the written report - both of which he testified that he didn't understand much of the medical / physiological content. [/quote] This is a great effort at clarifying the record, but I feel it is unfortunately lost on this agenda-driven mob.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics