Reply to Debate last night - change anything for anyone?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Debate last night - change anything for anyone?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For me? Yes. It reaffirmed just how complicit the media is with the Democratic party.

It's a very dangerous thing for the media not to be a neutral party.

My vote will go with the Republicans because that can't stand.[/quote]
The first step for you to heal is to shut off your main sources of "information." No Fox, no right wing radio, no clicking on that forward from your neighbor. You have to come back to Earth.[/quote]

I don't watch Fox. I do listen to those I know and have come to respect, who work at Breitbart, the Heritage Foundation,  and the Media Research Center.  I have lost respect for others from the WaPo and NYT because they have fallen into this pit.

I watch what's going on in Europe very carefully. They are our test case for what will happen when refugees are placed here with only the 'vetting' we have. It can't be good if multiple refugees placed here have had active TB. How can one miss that?[/quote]
What's going on in Europe is slightly different to here with respect to refugees.  Most of the "refugees" in Europe are economic refugees. They have admitted it as well.  The refugees Canada and the US have accepted are true refugees fleeing a war torn country. Even Pence and Trump admit that there is a humanitarian crisis in Syria, and Pence, at least, wants to do something about even though he tried to stop those refugees from settling in Indiana, but a judge over ruled him.. Trump's view is that it's a lost cause and we should just fold.  That's how he operates his business as well.  Cut your losses, and run, and let someone else pick up the pieces. Look at his latest flop - the Taj Mahal. You know who gets shafted on that deal... the taxpayers.[/quote]

We can't take that risk unless the vetting here improves dramatically.

Unions and the state of Atlantic City itself brought down the Taj. [/quote]
Has Trump defined how he is going to improve the vetting, or what "extreme vetting" even means?  We have had a few terrorist attacks and several arrests of people who are providing aid to ISIS.  NONE of them are refugees from Syrian, but several are white American citizens.  Your fear is not based on facts.  This is the problem I have with a total ban on refugees  Our bigger problem in this regard are American born, some from white families, who sympathize with these extremists groups.   I'm betting that the Feds are closely watching the refugees.  It's a lot harder to keep tabs on ordinary American citizens than it is on refugees.

The Taj Mahal tanked also because of Trump's mismanagement and Christie's corruption.  The taxpayers foot the bill.  As usual.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics