Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Judge Sotomayor is right: Ethnic heritage can affect judgement"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Troll score = 0 [b]Ethnic diversity[/b] (as well as any sort of diversity on SCOTUS, such as sexual, religious, SES, age, etc) increases SCOTUS's ability [b]to avoid bias[/b] by providing 9 (ahem, SHOULD be 9) exceptional minds who don't all think the same way. If a plurality of opinions didn't make the court smarter, than SCOTUS would be one person, wouldn't it? You are a really bad troll.[/quote] You just reaffirmed the thesis that ethnic background can cause biased judgement.[/quote] Logic failure! Diversity avoids bias, dummy. Or do you think that white male judge who only gave the white male rapist a 6-month sentence was totally cool? Oh, you're a DT supporter, so obviously you're white, so yeah, [i]diversity's bad for you[/i] since it decreases your privilege. [/quote] Hmm. In my experience as a non-white non-black immigrant, blacks are much more biased than whites. So, not sure I buy that diversity argument, unless you mean something very different from race itself.[/quote] Diversity doesn't necessarily avoid bias. But it can help. I don't think the judge in the Brock whatever-his-name-is case should have given such a light sentence, but neither do I agree with the calls for his removal. It's important for the judiciary to be independent. Some judges are light sentencers and some are heavy sentencers. For some it will depend on the case. And for many people, judges or not, unconscious bias comes into play. It's well documented that black defendants on average get heavier sentences than white defendants, regardless of the race of the judge. It's also well documented that sexual assault tends to result in lighter sentences than comparable violent crimes. Would a female judge of any race have given a heavier sentence? Maybe. Maybe not. There are so many factors at play that it's difficult to say in an individual case.[/quote] Let's take a look at the statue of Justice, shall we? See that blindfold? That means something. Justice is supposed to be blind/ A female judge should NOT be giving a heavier sentence because she is XX. That would be biased. It shouldn't even come into play. The judge in Brock Turner case didn't judge lightly because ... XY... He took into consideration, the kid's lack of priors, the fact that there was no evidence he deliberately dragged her behind a dumpster with intent to rape and the fact that they were both so intoxicated, there was no way of knowing whether he was even aware of the fact she was passed out. Those pissed about it are angry because they feel that HER intoxication should not even BE considered, that her lack of knowledge should even BE considered. When a judge of Hispanic origin rewards illegal aliens with scholarships, he is showing his bias. As a judge, he knows immigration law and is blatantly ignoring it. HUGE problem, as Trump would say. And he would be correct.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics