Reply to Can a 3.6 get into Harvard?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Can a 3.6 get into Harvard?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]People in privileged positions defend reliance on standardized tests because it lets them believe there is a controllable, [b]objectivity to things.[/b]  That is true at most colleges, but only somewhat the case at our most selective schools.  I remember well the episode oh The Sopranos where Meadow's mom acknowledged the reality that Tribal status would confer a key admissions edge.[/quote]

Well, when these measured things have significant and consistent correlations to outcomes in the real world it's hard not to.  Let's do an experiment; let in a bunch of kids with good grades (3.9+) and low SAT scores (&lt; 1000) to MIT, treat them like the rest of the students and see how they do.  I'll bet SAT at that point becomes HIGHLY predictive of success. [/quote]

The experiments (sort of) have already been done. The College Board has long touted statistics correlating high SAT performance with college success. of course, it does not mean some students who do not test well can't outperform at college, but the test is very predictive generally.

More importantly, the comment about people who are "privileged" favoring standardized testing is quite naive.  Indeed, people with true privilege - the wealthy in America for generations - had nothing to gain by such testing and much to loose.  The SAT was originally seen as an equalizer letting the smart hard working public school kid prove he was as deserving as the child from money.  It gave the less privileged a chance.  I really doubt George W Bush was helped by SATs to get into Yale, but thousands of hard working bright kids from less privileged backgrounds have been.  The world is now turned on its head as standardized testing is deemed oppressive if it isn't perfect. [/quote]
SAT have little correlation with success in college or beyond. High school grades are a better indicator of college success and college grades are an indicator of work success for only three years after graduation. People make too big of a deal about URM students. They make up a very small % of the students. If you did away with these preferences, your kid is still not getting in. There is a big stack applications of kids with 4.2 to 4.5 gpa, prefect sat/act scores from top private high schools who do not get in. Also the kids who get in with the lower score have somes pretty incredible backround stories. The competition for every slot is fierce...even for the hooked wealthy people, URM, athletes etc. Don't kid yourself.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics