Reply to Clinton Daily News Integiew

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Clinton Daily News Integiew"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This endorsement!

[url]http://m.nydailynews.com/opinion/vote-hillary-clinton-article-1.2598171?utm_content=buffer42c01&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=NYDailyNewsTw[/url][/quote]

They certainly didn't mince words. And I would say it was fair based on those interviews. [/quote]

It wasn't based on the interviews.  They had their minds made up long before the interview.  Their clear bias showed in the interviews.[/quote]
Let's assume that's true, just for the sake of argument. A candidate who can't definitively deal with an incompetent of biased nterview is frankly not someone who will be able to deal with much of anything as president. [/quote]

Yep. Bernie could've easily corrected that, and really shown the depth of his knowledge on the matter. I don't think he is one to be worried about the interviewer's feelings. [/quote]

Lame.  You clearly didn't actually read the transcript, because he [i]did[/i] correct the interviewer but the interviewer was not interested in being corrected and instead just moved on to the next item, the interviewer had an agenda in mind (hence it was no surprise to see their endorsement of Clinton, which was no doubt already decided before the interview even happened).  Had Sanders gotten more aggressive and assertive than he did about correcting the interviewer I'm sure they would have loved that, because then they would have played him up as hostile, angry and uncooperative.[/quote]

Can you post that exchange? I must've missed it. [/quote]

Every time Sanders refers to the Treasury or the administration (via Treasury) the interviewers respond with "the Fed" clearly muddled on the difference between the two, this happens twice and Sanders goes back to correcting the interviewer and going back to talking about administration regulators.  The second time the interviewers then just change the subject.  It was really messy on the NYDN's part.[/quote]
You keep acting as though this was the only part of the interview that Bernie was we gone. It clearly wasn't.

There's a common theme among some of you,[b] that Bernie is always a victim. Does he have to take ownership of anything[/b]?  Is he not responsible even for an interview? [/quote]

I feel this way too and it's not a good look. I would have much more respect for a candidate who admits a mistake and moves on. There's always an explanation for Bernie's mistakes and questionable votes.   Always. I don't think I have ever heard him admit to making a mistake.

And there's something to be said about supporters who do not question their candidate on such mistakes. You are not helping him be a good leader. [/quote]

This is exactly the way I feel about Hillary. Every negative thing that is said is because she is a woman or people are unfair to her. The entire world jus misunderstands Hillary. Poor Hillary. It is so much ridiculous whining. So much apologizing. It is getting absurd. [/quote]

Nope, I personally don't think she's doing a good job with BLM, and she needs to address that.

See? I can admit that and still support her. Supporting her doesn't mean that I say "yes, dear leader" to whatever she does or says. It means I generally like what she stands for and I will call her out when she fucks up. [/quote]

And the Sanders supporters constantly say they do not agree with him on guns. Everyone says that. But his weaknesses in policy don't even come close. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics