Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Sanders Campaign Got a Love Letter From FEC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am not sure who I am voting for - most likely Clinton- but I really like Sanders and trust that he would not do anything illegal or unethical. He from all accounts is a good and ethical man. [/quote] It's not him, nor is it his campaign. It's more likely people using different email addresses and slight variations on their names to contribute multiple times in excess amounts. Could be Republicans, for all we know. [/quote] If you look at the report, it is mostly trivial amounts. The first excessive contribution is over by $50. The second by $38.[/quote] Except for the $23 million. [/quote] The $23 million consists of contributions that are reported as totals given by an individual rather than as an itemized list of contributions from those individuals. It is nothing more than a reporting issue.[/quote] It's a criticial reporting issue. The means by which the FEC and presumably the candidate makes sure that people are giving more than they are permitted under law. And someone who makes campaign finance reform the linchpin of their campaign should have this down.[/quote] The total of contributions made by each individual was reported. Excess donations would be revealed by that number. I agree that it should have been done correctly and, if for some reason Sanders is unable to provide the itemized data or the itemized contributions don't add up to the reported totals, those are bigger problems. But, at this stage there is no reason to suspect this is anything more than a mistake in how the data was formatted for the report. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics