Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Prepping for entry into AAP"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Oh, it's the person who posts over and over in an attempt to conflate test prep with studying and hard work. [/quote] No, it's the person who posts over and over in an attempt to conflate test prep with not belonging and not "smart enough".[/quote] Lots of kids study and work hard and never do test prep. I know plenty of [b]high-achieving students[/b] who haven't done test prep for AAP or TJ. And let's face it, a smart kid who works hard is going to go farther than a less intelligent kid who works just as hard, whether test prep is involved or not. [/quote] This is where I think the conversation needs to focus. There are high-achievers because they have an average to above average intelligence and work hard - these kids can do well in a traditional classroom with differentiation. There are high-achievers that are highly intelligent that may or may not learn well in a traditional classroom. And then, there are highly intelligent to genius and above which do not do well in a traditional classroom. The 3rd set of kids NEED a special needs classroom/curriculum, the 2nd set may or may not need a different classroom setting and the 1st set DO NOT NEED a different classroom/curriculum. I do think the bar could be set a little higher across the gen ed curriculum for many students, but that's where differentiation comes in. A special needs gifted class/curriculum is not needed. I wish they would go back to the actual gifted classes and not open AAP to every high achiever or kid pushed by their parents.[/quote] So you must be against Local Level IV as well, right?[/quote] No, why would I be? Isn't that a form of differentiation? I have one kid that is smart and a high-achiever. He likes to do well in school, he likes to get "gold stars" for doing good work and following directions. I have another that has a very high IQ but isn't motivated by the next "gold star." She NEEDS a different type of classroom and curriculum. He does not, yet parents of kids just like my son are tripping over themselves to get their kid in aap. Maybe they need to up the bar in the gen ed class, but they need to have a gifted program for kids that are truly beyond the norm of smart. They have different needs. It's one of those "you would know it if you saw it" kind of things. Most kids in this area are smart, high achievers, and have a supportive learning environment in their homes but that doesn't make them gifted or in need of a special classroom or curriculum. I can tell you pretty easily who the highly gifted kids are and who the smart, high-achievers are in the app class. Some teachers are great with our DD and others still prefer the high achievers in their classroom because they are easier. I just wished they would return the program to an actual gifted-only program so kids like my DD's would get more of what they really need. I also wish they would raised the bar in the gen ed classroom or at least offer more consistent differentiation within the gen ed classroom so parents wouldn't be so pushy to get their kids into what should be a special needs classroom.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics