Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Any bets on who was blackmailing Hastert?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]WSJ says this: [i] Yet another question: why federal prosecutors are bringing charges against Mr. Hastert in the first place. Bringing charges related to any allegedly illegal sexual misconduct, especially if it happened decades ago, would likely be banned entirely by statutes-of-limitations. The charges against Mr. Hastert—lying and attempting to avoid money-laundering laws—are relatively minor, legal experts say.[/i] That's a good question, actually. I'd like to hear the answer to this.[/quote] Are you suggesting that "minor" illegality should be ignored? Why? The guy lied to the FBI and illegally structured withdrawals. Why should he get pass? [/quote] Agreed. Also, WSJ quoter, Illinois passed a law recently eliminating the statute of limitations on sexual crimes against children. Just FYI.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
