Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Wilson funding petition v. At Risk funding petition"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Agree with PP. It is the way they are rolling out these "fixes" now. Bowser was elected in November. Couldn't families and students have had fair notice that if they accumulate those 10 absences this year they will truly be bounced? Couldn't families who relied on the casual system of enrolling OOB siblings have had some heads up that come spring enrollment they will NOT have this option? And it feels as if they are profiling to a certain degree, after all who is to say that a number of these students/families may have applied to privates or charters earlier on in the school year, rather than rounding up kids to populate their new experiment in SE and other under enrolled (and thus far under performing) schools? Eventually the same result would occur and it would help ease the swell in the hallways, but this feels almost like it was by design. And if that is the case it reflects the opposite of the admin and mayor's purported goals -- to give every kid a chance at a good education ("Deal for All").[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics