Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Salary question -- fed lawyer transitioining to law firm"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I recently left a fed agency after 8 years. Not DOJ, very specialized regulatory area. I got 3 biglaw counsel offers. Ranged 295-325, one included signing bonus. Counsel is not up or out where I ended up (top 3 DC firm). Hope that helps. I would call a HH, they can really help looking and negotiating at this level.[/quote] Thanks -- yes, that is my next step. I really appreciate hearing from someone who has actually been in a similar position! I was a little taken aback by all the backlash I encountered here, so I followed up with my colleagues who left within the past two months -- for anyone following, one of whom was an AUSA for 6 years, now off counsel, making 350, one of whom was DOJ/fraud/small section for 9 years, partner, around 350 also. I think it is just very different than the track for those who stay at a firm from the get go. [/quote] Sounds like a non equity partner at that salary. OP, tried to give you balanced advice but frankly, you sound very condescending. Doubt your friends who have been at a firm for two months know more about how firms work then the partners and others with longer track records at firms. Litigators tend to be a dime a dozen, unlike the poster with the niche regulatory practice. Best of luck to you.[/quote] Not that it make any sense to argue, but, frankly, you are clearly the condescending one here -- "dime a dozen." And nobody said anything about litigation per se. Many former colleagues are doing regulatory work and there are clearly options to do that, also -- FCPA, etc. I never indicated that anyone knew more than you, or other experienced law firmers, do about long term prospects, but I had one very specific starting question. [/quote] Not PP. No one can answer that specific question because you didn't provide enough specific detail. I doubt you'll last long at a firm if you're stupid to realize that and you treat colleagues the way you've treated people on this thread. [/quote] I'm really not sure why you are both so angry or how you think you have been "treated." I can't give away many details and I have to be vague -- sorry if that makes it difficult, and I get that. Many posted that there would not be any opportunities, and I discussed recent experiences to redirect the conversation. Calling me stupid and dismissing my credentials, and telling me I have no idea how things work or how to get clients and I have no book of business so will never get a job -- those are opinions based on your subjective experiences, and I am not responding to them because it does not matter if you do not believe I will get a job at your firm. I am merely noting that there are indeed opportunities for some at some firms, who knows if I will be among them, and I am interested in salary because I am considering whether it makes sense to make such a move from a purely financial perspective. I am not sure why that makes you so defensive. I am not dismissing your experience or knowledge but if there are no opportunities for me at some places, there still may be at others, so that is what I am focusing on here. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics