Reply to I suck at common core math

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "I suck at common core math"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have 2 bachelors degree's, one in elementary education with a minor in math, the second in technology, and I needed someone to explain to me the thought process of common core addition. I think for children who have issues learning how to add larger numbers, it's not a bad option, however I don't think it should be the primary focus.[/quote]

I teach my kids math afterschool with a variety of math materials/curriculums including Singapore Math and from a Japanese Textbook translated into English. If you look at how addition and subtraction is taught there it is what Common Core lists as the standards. The whole idea is to get kids to understand that numbers can be broken apart and put back together again so you can easily add or subtract in our base 10 system (which is what composing/decomposing numbers is all about).  I love that my kids can solve a problem like 18 + 19= ?  several different ways. 
They can solve it using the traditional algorithm (add 8+9, put down 7 under the line in the ones place and carry the one; 1 +1+1 equals 3, write down the 3 under the line so the answer is 37). However, doing it that way doesn't get kids to understand you aren't carrying "one" you really are adding 10. 
So my kids can also add it right to left, so 10 + 10 = 20; 8+9+ 17; then 20 +17 =37.  
They also can use compensation so they can add one to the 19 and take away one from the 18 so the problem becomes 20 +17 = 37
They also can make both numbers into 20 by adding 2 to the 18 and 1 to the 19, then subtracting 3 from the final answer so 20+20 = 40; 40-3 =37.

What my kids hate in school is having to explain in writing what they have done. UGH! No where in Singapore or Japanese Math do they make you write down your explanation in a paragraph. So my kids can easily do the math different ways which meet Common Core Standards yet whoever is interpreting the standards has made up that you have to write a paragraph explaining your answer or draw 37 circles. [/quote]

I agree with you 100%, on every point.  I think there are some good things about 2.0.  But the explaining in words part is a bit overkill, especially for kids that are not verbal.  However, I believe the reason why they incorporated this is because they want the kids to be able to explain their thinking, and with 25+ kids in the class, the easiest way for a teacher to gauge this is by the kids writing their explanation.

In 3rd grade, when they test for compacted math, I think the teachers do use different methods when testing, including letting the kid answer verbally.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics