Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Proposal Implications: Loss of Proximity, Forced to go to Lowest Performing School, Concerns OOB"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]And 15:43 you are also wrong, the new boundary line is not at Albermarle to avoid a zig zag. The new proposed boundary is a zig zag, just a different one. And there is no benefit to a straight line over a zig zag in any case esp when the zig zag is the established line. Also pp who keep saying the OP wasn't talking about Murch/Hearst b/c the of that 2 block radius comment, that is wrong. The OP didn't say anything about 2 blocks. The OP said "close proximity." It is likely that the OP is talking about this boundary. And I agree that no one is maligning Hearst. But if there is going to be a citywide defense of neighborhood schools then proximity has to be respected. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
