Reply to AAP - A new perspective

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "AAP - A new perspective"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I completely agree with OP.

Every school should be implementing the Level IV curriculum across the board.  This alone would make our entire school system exceptional rather than just for a subgroup of students and mediocre for the rest.

[b]That same curriculum can be accelerated WITHIN the base school for the extremely high IQ students (this would be a much smaller number than the current AAP population) with pullouts with specialists and those that need additional support can also be given extra help WITHIN the base school via pullouts with specialists (as is already the case).
[/b]
With normal pacing, every average to above-average kid will do just fine with the Level IV curriculum and this is the [u]vast majority[/u] of FCPS.

Why are we expecting excellent curriculum for just a subset of our students, why not for the majority?

Dear Dr. Garza,
FCPS needs to wake up and see that catering to the few will in the end deteriorate our entire school system.

[/quote]

Having done this with a highly gifted child, and done the center program, the AAP center model is far superior to what you are suggesting, and[b] provides the best opportunity to meeting the needs of highly gifted kids.[/b][/quote]

[b]Again, meeting the needs of a much smaller subset rather than the entire school system.  [/b][/quote]

You know, whatever services my kid in an AAP center class receives to meet his educational needs has zero, absolutely zero bearing on how my other non-center school kids needs are met.  None whatsoever.

In fact, I think that my other non-center kids academic needs are better served by having some kids over at the center because A) the one who does well in school is able to be challenged as one of the "brighter" kids in his class now, where if all the center kids were still there he would be at the bottom of the top or the top of the middle. and B) my child who is average and sometimes struggling at school now has a more concise pool of ability in his non-center class and gets to be in the thick of the pack and not stand out as a kid who struggles.

All of the kids are getting challenged.  All of the kids age getting their needs met.

The only downfall is when the center placement affects the ego of the parents, and as a trickle down affect the confidence of the kids.  Although for the most part, I lay that at the feet of the  parents on how they deal with a child's disappointment.  Is the parent stoking the fire by acting like the kid is a victim by not being placed at the center?  Or are they taking the non-placement as an opportunity for their kid to receive the best education possible as where their needs are?  It is all in the attitude.

One child receiving the mandated education that fcps has deemed necessary is not taking away from a single other student.[/quote]

Perhaps, [b]unless we're talking about a Gen Ed child who has to attend a center school as his/her base school[/b].  This is a situation which emphasizes in the worst possible way the division of AAP kids and Gen Ed kids, by having fewer GE classes than AAP.  It makes the Gen Ed students feel as though they are in the "less than" class, which is the preposterous result of expanding AAP to the non-gifted.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics