Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "How is the meeting at Dunbar going?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This whole at risk set aside is a HORRIBLE plan! In D.C. the face of "at-risk" is, in peoples' minds, the young black child. With this plan, the young black child at a Janney or Lafayette or Hearst, will immediately be identified as one of the "at risk" set aside kids. Will this make black kid that is in bounds feel pressure to have his peers know that "I am not one of them"? Will this make the OOB at risk child feel somehow "less than"? Will people look on that child with disdain? This has huge unfortunate social repercussions especially when "at risk" is closely associated with race in the minds of people.[/quote] +1,000 Set asides are essentially the same as busing to integrate schools in the 70s. I was an AA kid in Boston at the time who lived IB for white schools and I can tell you from first-hand experience, there are people 30 years later who still think I'm from the projects and that I got into better schools than them because of it. :roll: I got over it, but there was definitely a negative impact on stability of my friends who were bused DC has a horrible track record of helping at-risk children to begin with. Divvying them up over the city to schools with no experience in the complexity of their needs but good results with general population makes absolutely no sense. It didn't occur to me that set asides would be a serious part of the proposal. Set asides are not the answer to any question. Check out David Catania's Fair Student Funding and School-Based Budgeting Amendment Act of 2013. http://www.davidcatania.com/fairfunding "The Act will build into the Uniform per Student Funding Formula—the mechanism used to fund public schools in the District—a dedicated funding stream for students who are at risk of academic failure, as identified by the following risk factors: homelessness, within the foster care system, eligible for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or above the expected age for their grade. According to data provided by the Office of State Superintendent of Education (OSSE), nearly 35,000 public school students met this definition of at-risk in the 2012-2013 school year. The Act requires that the vast majority of this funding—90 percent—goes straight to the schools to be spent by principals, with input from members of their Local School Advisory Teams." This puts the burden on schools and the city to deliver support for students. Set asides subject students to the vagaries of yet another type of lottery. It's like the Hunger Games where only the poorest of the poor survive to then be paraded around for their non-poor peers so they can experience diversity. If it takes the DME this long to come up with crappy social engineering that doesn't address the root of the problem, why waste any more time? November can't come soon enough for me. Catania for Mayor!!! Please!!![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics