Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "Bullis v. Landon v. St. Andrews"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]What do you mean by good placement? Sidwell/STA type placement (20+% of class going to Ivies/MIT/Stanford) or Landon type placement (10% going to Ivies/MIT/Stanford). My guess is that Bullis is below neighboring Wootton with regards to placement. Not only did Wootton place more students at top schools (19/20 students accepted in 2013 compared to 22 by Bullis between 2009 and 2013) but the average SAT at Churchill is almost 100 higher than that at Bullis. I am not knocking Bulllis but I don't understand the value proposition. If you live in one of the W/B-CC/RM districts or can get your kid into Blair, why spend money for Bullis. We looked at the school and we like the facilities and student body but we could not get over the cost issue. I know people joke about Bullis being the the public school where you can pay tuition but the thought crossed my mind. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
