Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "How would this controlled choice nonsense actually work on Capitol Hill?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Shutting down Capitol Hill schools that are hugely OOB would probably help the remaining schools turn into neighborhood schools faster. This would accelerate the flip, which, as a person IB for a CH school that is very very far from such a flip, I would be happy. [/quote] You're forgetting one hugely important point, namely that most of the OOB that you potentially vilify with this statement are actually your neighbors. Take Watkins: It has a considerable OOB population simply because for years, decades in fact, few found Maury good enough or even Brent good enough. They enrolled their kids and siblings at Watkins. Tyler has a large OOB population from all over Capitol Hill because some place a heavy emphasis on Spanish. So you want to close those because they're popular options drawing from the Hill catchment? How absurd! If you feel so strongly that people's enrollment desires should somehow be steered towards certain options, then "controlled choice" is a much better way to do that than heavy handed and contentious school closures. As stated previously, "controls" (i.e. weights) can be added for any number of things such as proximity, siblings, language, etc.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics