Reply to Why rankings are bunk

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Why rankings are bunk"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I did get into Columbia.  And i chose NYU over Columbia.  I'm not full of crap, its the truth.  I think I know far more about this than you do.

The caliber of student everywhere has improved. the acceptance rates everywhere have declined.  Thats true for many, many schools.  This has nothing to do with US News and everything to do with demographic changes (including far more international applicants as well as the baby boomlet), the common app, better outreach to previously underrepresented groups.

I wonder how old you are.  I went to college in the early 80s.  Cornell and Dartmouth did not attract the top students, more like 2nd and 3rd tier.  Columbia didn't seem to attract anyone because the housing situation back then was horrific.  Penn was a sought after school and I applied while I did not apply to the others.  Frankly what has changed about Penn is not its overall reputation but its relatively new reputation as a Wharton school, preprofessional haven.  I think the Wharton school didn't even have an undergraduate arm back then and now it seems to have taken over the whole school.   For my DC, this makes Penn very UNattractive.

I didn't go to Penn, I went to Princeton.  I wrote that before.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics