Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Why rankings are bunk"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]11:49 again. Just to clarify. Acceptance rates are one of several components that go into the USNWR index. So anything that increases applications to a school will reduce the school's acceptance rate. And, because this feeds (with other things) into the school's USNWR ranking, this will lead to a rise in the school's place in the rankings. Therefore, marketing, which improves a school's reputation, can definitely lead to a rise in applications and a corresponding rise in USNWR rankings. Apparently Tulane tried to change its image with brochures showing students in lab coats. Applications plummeted. For Tulane, New Orleans is a big selling point, so when it switched to pics of art students taking notes in the French Quarter, applications rose again. I think I read this in Crazy U. I also read somewhere that Stanford didn't have the same reputation a few decades ago. Maybe 5-6 decades ago, I'm not sure.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics