Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Win-win solutions for Brent?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][/quote] [b]That's right, no need to rope young Brent District families into the Van Ness game.[/b] Plenty of middle-class Ludlow-Taylor, Payne, Miner and Tyler families who don't want Spanish would also be interested if Van Ness gets off to a good start. With Two Rivers having the longest school-wide waiting list in the city--nearly 1,800 families--the need for another strong Hill ES is clear. DCPS wants to count a critical mass of kids in the new residential housing around Van Ness to open it, for political reasons? [/quote] But I think the point of the working group being talked about is that Brent may well be roped into some game like it or not because of potential overcrowding/redistricting. Are current Brent parents who didn't have to be involved in the lottery and are wise enough to avoid DCUM aware of potential boundary changes and other potential solutions to more kids coming in at K (e.g. trailers)?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
