Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Princeton spared from endowment tax"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ironically Princeton will now be "need aware" as it has to make sure it doesn't take too many full pay kids. Sorry - too rich - we don't want you. You'll trigger the tax. Or "we have too many full pay kids - here's a full scholarship you don't really need. Congratulations!"[/quote] The rich are still very overrepresented at Princeton, just a bit less than at Harvard and Yale. Need-blind has never existed anyway. Of course, at any point, Princeton could dole out dollars not on the basis of need. Or make the school free for anyone making under $500,000 year. The possibilities are endless. [/quote] I don't think the rich are over-represented at all. Compared to the past, there are many more kids on aid. This is a university, not a charity. Personally I think a lot of the top schools have gone overboard tripping over themselves to admit FGLI kids.[/quote] Someone definitely missed the point of the endowment tax, which is that so-called charities should not be tax exempt if they’re hoarding money and overwhelmingly serving the rich.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics