Reply to 2035, 2034, 2033 Girls

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "2035, 2034, 2033 Girls"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The older Hoco teams not being good has nothing to do with the 2034s. They were never good and the overall club is ranked incredibly low. It’s been a landing place for girls who want a little more than rec. Having a good team, let alone as winning as the 2034s is new and unique to that coach coming to the table with a team from Carroll County. But there are always a number of clubs that have good youth teams for the first two years that never translates into more. Rebels, FLC, Broadneck (‘34s), Limelight, Hoco, etc. [/quote]

In addition, Hoco forms a formal team a year before NGLL eligibility. That helps them have very competitive teams at the youngest age. For instance, they have a ‘36 team that is fully formed right now and competing in MYLA (or something) and goes to fall and summer tournaments. They are being indoctrinated into pink and flamingos to keep them around next year. The 2035 team played together last year for an entire season and tournaments. Whereas Hero’s just had their developmental clinic series (gets them the top talent pool but they come with zero experience playing in real games or together) and M&D had literally nothing (no feeder at all, so at the biggest disadvantage starting out but obviously they pick up steam as the years go on).

Weirdly, Skywalkers has a 2035 team but it’s not in NGLL. Anyone know why?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics