Reply to Counting home value in net worth

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "Counting home value in net worth"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Puzzling that people think only assets that throw off income can be included in one's net worth.

What about gold bars, high value artwork, etc.?[/quote]

When people ask about our NW, we only include our non-earmarked liquid assets. This is the truly meaningful amount and omits anything that provides utility or is set aside for a future expense: functional NW as opposed to technical NW.

In this functional NW number, we exclude our home, cars, personal property, 529 plans, retirement accounts, and HSAs. In our experience, the more affluent people all do the same thing. It is the upper middle class and below that tends to inflate their NW estimates using any means available to keep up with the Joneses.

We’re in our early 40s and have a functional NW – by our practical definition – of about $10M. If we include ALL ASSETS and ALL LIABILITIES, our technical NW is closer to $300M. [/quote]

$10 vs $300 is a big difference!! For comparison my #s would be around $14 vs $18 M. Is your house worth $200 M? [/quote]

I agree---their numbers do not add up/make much sense.

[/quote]

She’s saying that what she has in checking and stock accounts. I have no idea of her numbers add up (though seriously don’t someone with $300M is posting here) but I can read. [/quote]

I can also read.  And it is highly unlikely someone has only $10M in "functional net worth" and it goes to $300M when you add in homes.  Highly unlikely

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics