Reply to Disney World: Trade offs of staying on property vs off

Forum Index » Travel Discussion

Reply to "Disney World: Trade offs of staying on property vs off"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We’ve stayed in all the monorail resorts and Animal Kingdom. Pros and cons to each. I wouldn’t stay off property because it’s nice to take a break and go back without losing tons of time in transit.

1. GF - the nicest but agree with posters saying it’s priced like a Ritz but the rooms feels like a Hilton. Pros were great Christmas decorations and better food in the casual sit down restaurant.
2. Polynesian- rooms are meh but kids loved the pools, dole whip and Oahano restaurant. 
3. Contemporary- IMO most convenient as you can walk to the park or monorail, food is bad except the top floor fine dining restaurant. Pools are good.
4. Animal Kingdom - great lobby, common areas, rooms nicer than other places, food the best, pools great. The big downside was the shuttle bus. So annoying as you are in a long line but no matter how close you get to the front a fat person on a scooter will roll up with 8 relatives jumping the line. Never stayed here again after 4 days and nights of this nonsense. [/quote]

All of these mean you’ll have daily room inspections at whatever time Disney decides they want to enter your room. [/quote]

The doors have those things that keep them from opening all of the way anyway...[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics