Reply to Anyone regret getting child a neuropsych. eval.?

Forum Index » Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities

Reply to "Anyone regret getting child a neuropsych. eval.?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We found it helpful. One DS was tested at six years old and it put us on the right track immediately. He has dyslexia and it was very helpful to push us to get the right intervention and really lean into it. It’s made all the difference in the world.

The 2nd DS was a bit of a surprise. We didn’t know what the heck was going on with him and got him tested when he was 10 because we thought he had dyslexia because of the genetic factor. Nope. Very very much ADHD. We didn’t know what ADHD could look like and thought it was x when it can be y, z, and m. Almost off the charts. Reading intervention/tutoring would do zero for all that and the only thing that helped him academically and socially is stimulants. He’s in such a better place now and he has an improved understanding of his reactions and impulses.

None of the above would have been possible without the neuro-psych. [/quote]

You don’t need a “full neuropsych” to diagnose the issues you listed. [/quote]

You are correct. With the first one, we did the psycho educational testing instead. But with the second one, we absolutely needed the full neuropysch. Trust me.[/quote]

Not sure why? ADHD is not actually diagnosed through neuropsychological tests (or exclusively that way). [/quote]

How often do you post here? How many times do people have to explain to you that some cases do need a clinician to spend a lot of time with the child and reviewing documents and questionnaires to diagnose. Like with my kid, the cognitive testing showed she was solidly average in everything except one area and that contributed to the diagnosis in addition to the condition specific diagnostic assessment.

Sometimes early intervention doesn't matter. But it often does and to get it (either for insurance to pay or just to know your kid needs it) you need a diagnosis, the earlier the better. That might mean getting the diagnosis before it is obvious to a pediatrician who might spend 15 minutes with a kid 2-3 times per year.[/quote]

How many times do you need to be told that what you described is neither necessary nor sufficient to diagnose ADHD? [/quote]

You're not listening. Number 1 I am not talking about ADHD. I am a DP. Number 2, you seem to think only people with straightforward cases should be diagnosed, and that is wrong and harmful.[/quote]

No. I am saying that a diagnosis (straightforward or not) does not require the generic, expensive battery of cognitive tests commonly called a “full neuropsych.” [/quote]

I’m not the PP but what would you suggest instead?[/quote]

I would ask the person offering the “full neuropsych” to list each test they are going to do and explain the function and how the outcome will affect your child’s treatment plan/therapy. But preferably, I would start with therapy for the obvious challenges then explore what kind of diagnostic assessment needs to be made. Then I would research the best practices for the various possible diagnoses. It’s never going to be one size fits all. [/quote]
I am the PP and I and everyone else I know in our situation got therapy for the obvious challenges first. I don't understand why you are promoting this narrative where people are just wandering into neuropsych practices for no reason. [/quote]

I mean, I’m not the one who posted this thread. Clearly a lot of other people agree. I’m sure in some cases it is indicated but the knee-jerk “pay $8000 for a full neuropsych” advice is misleading. And also the reason why places like Children have had to outright say that they won’t schedule neuropsychs except for the kids that really need them (eg epilepsy or brain tumor). [/quote]

Institutions like Children's and KKI have had to limit their criteria for evaluations because of the immense need creating unmanageably long wait-lists. You make it sound like they looked at their multiple years long wait-lists and thought, "these people don't really need evaluations" instead of "we do not have the capacity to serve all these people so we need to prioritize".

You also seem to think it's fine to delay accurate diagnosis. It can be tough to untangle multiple concerns like social issues, learning issues and mental health issues. The time it takes to do that costs money.[/quote]

I absolutely think Children’s and KKI looked through their waitlist and realized that a good percentage don’t need the full neuropsych testing.

AGAIN  - the point I am making is not about diagnosis but the belief that an expensive, resource intensive “full neuropsych” is the only way to get a diagnosis. Most of us have limited financial resources and it is better to spend them on therapy and focused assessment. [/quote]

It's obviously not the only way in general to get n ADHD or ASD or other diagnosis. Nobody has said that. But it is the only way to get correct diagnoses for some kids and it gives more than that, specifically recommendations for supports that are specific to a kid based on a comprehensive look at their needs.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics