Reply to Forbes "New Ivy" List

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Forbes "New Ivy" List"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NYU and USC should replace Tufts and Case. [/quote]

Why do your think so?[/quote]
Case isnt a hard admit and is undesired by almost everyone. Tufts doesn't have great post grad placement like the others two. [/quote]

Well Tufts has excellent post grad placement lists for at least the two areas I have focused on for building my twins college lists: Pre-med and IR.

In terms of Case Western being "undesirable" do you mean their 35% acceptance rate. While that is higher than all the other new ivies on the list (which are closer to 10-12%), there are other reasons they cited for including Case (C-level employer and hiring partner survey, AI innovation/adaptation). It sounds like Case was just brought in as the sole new addition this year while most of the others (including Tufts) have been on it for all three consecutive years.[/quote]washu wasnt there the first year, neither was tufts. [/quote]

My bad, I saw two different posts for last year's list (which they both were on) and mixed up the dates. Case is new this year, and WashU/Tufts and maybe others were new last year and repeated this year. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics