Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan New York City
Reply to "College placements"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Brearley having another banger year. [/quote] How are the completely unconnected kids doing[/quote] Right. One reason why MIT matriculation seems salient is that they do not consider legacy in admissions. So 25 girls to Harvard over 5 years is difficult to read in terms of the unconnected success indication, whereas only one (1) MIT matriculation (and also only 1 to Caltech, another legacy blind, though much smaller, school) gives you pause, at least if you have a STEM-oriented kid -- which we do.[/quote] I can’t speak for students at these schools as I’ve never attended. But if a student loves the liberal arts focused curriculum at a place like Brearley, Trinity or Collegiate, a place like MIT would not be as appealing. Saying this as an alum of MIT. [/quote] Of course! The thing is, one of the main selling points for SS girls' schools at their tours is that in the absence of boys girls can be unimpeded in traditionally boy-dominated fields (math, comp sci, etc), and the schools would support and nurture that. So presumably, this is geared towards at least *some* science-oriented girls. (And one of the draws of private schools to us is the strength of the liberal arts curriculum, which I think is hugely valuable - maybe even more so - for a kid going into science.)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics