Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Anyone's athlete not pursue being recruited "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Most top athletes do not end up selecting lower tiered schools. Either they play at Ivys, or Hopkins, Chicago, military academies, or they play at Duke, Wake, W&M, UVA, Michigan etc. Most top athletes are committing to top tier schools. If the athlete is a nonstarter at club.. that's when this decision level comes in. [/quote] That is a big generalization. The top athletes that were also top scholars got recruited to some top ivies. If they didn't have the academics for the top ivies it was a no-go. Some of those lower academic athletes, I saw go to the military academies.[/quote] You do not have to have top scholar credentials to be recruited at an Ivy. You do have to be a pretty good athlete. This is especially true with sports like football, basketball, baseball. Strictly from an academic standpoint, I found that academic standards are lower at Ivies than at schools like Hopkins, Chicago, MIT, Carnegie Mellon. On the other hand, athletic standards are higher at Ivies. Michigan is not even in the same realm bc the athletic standards are generally much higher, and there is an actual chance at NIL $, depending on the sport. The military academies are not a monolith; some are D1; others are D3.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics