Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Please suggest lower reach and target schools"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Tufts, Wesleyan, Vassar, Oberlin, Rochester (in rough order of selectivity). [/quote] For OP, some of these are safeties. Tufts yield protects RD so it’s a low reach, but schools like Rochester oberlin Wesleyan should be safeties. [/quote] Keep thinking Wes is a “safety” for anyone in RD. Good luck! [/quote] Wes is not what it once was. Sadly. Interest level is not very high. If you are at a competitive private school, yes it’s a safety. This is not 90’s anymore.[/quote] You love to repeat this exact comment when Wes comes up. The school had a record number of applicants and one of its largest freshman classes this year so you’ll have to forgive me if I don’t agree that interest isn’t very high. I should know better than engaging with this kind of trolling, but no, even for Groton or Harvard Westlake or whatever you want to say to is a competitive private, Wes is not a safety for anyone. Not in RD. [/quote] +1 Our private school counselor put it firmly in the match (not safety by any stretch) category for our high performing student at a well known, extremely competitive private high school. [/quote] Looking at our Naviance, the acceptance rate for top 10% kids is 100% to Wes in the past five years. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics