Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Overall Tiers of the Top Schools"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Saw this online elsewhere, how do people here feel about this? [b]S+ Tier (Exceptional at everything, extremely resourced, global prestige)[/b]: -Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton (No glaring weaknesses) [b]S Tier (Exceptional at nearly everything, extremely resourced, global prestige)[/b]: -Caltech (Amazing STEM but worse at humanities than MIT) -Yale (Amazing humanities but lagging S+ tier in STEM) -Duke (Very well rounded and perhaps greatest upside in S tier, but youngest of elite schools) -Columbia (Very well rounded but hurting from recent scandals, still benefits from being in NYC) -UChicago (Strong humanities and sciences but lacking in engineering) -UPenn (Very well rounded but perhaps too centered around Wharton that can create odd dynamic with the non-Wharton students) [b]A+ Tier (Exceptional at many things, heavily resourced, national prestige)[/b]: -Northwestern (Very well rounded, closest to being S tier) -Johns Hopkins (Pointy in strengths, perhaps too centered around medicine) -Dartmouth (Strong undergrad focus, but lacking strong research backing and global reputation of S tier) -Berkeley (Academically phenomenal all around similar to S+ tier and high global prestige, but significantly hurt in lack of resources and attention for undergrads) -Cornell (Good at STEM and niche programs like agriculture, but lagging in other traditional fields and a bit weaker in undergrad focus) -Brown (Weakest academically of ivies | Not quite as undergrad focused as Dartmouth and not quite an S tier research institution) -WASP + Bowdoin (Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore, Pomona, Bowdoin) Most elite liberal arts educations, minimal global prestige compared to others in this tier [b]A Tier (Exceptional at many things, well resourced, national prestige)[/b]: -Vanderbilt (Needs to cement itself as a top research institution, closest to being A+ tier) -Rice (Strong undergrad focus and very well resourced, but lacking global reputation) -UMich (Well rounded with strong research, lacking undergrad attention) -Georgetown (Incredibly elite for humanities, but severely lacking in STEM and could use more financial resources) -Notre Dame (Superb financial resources, but limited research excellence) -Washington University in St. Louis (Great financial resources, but pointy in strengths towards medicine/science) -UCLA (Strong research, but struggles with undergraduate resources) -Carnegie Mellon (Inverse Georgetown: strong STEM, severely lacking in humanities despite strong points in arts and theatre) -Harvey Mudd + Olin College of Engineering + Claremont McKenna (Specialized LACs that are very strong in their areas of expertise)[/quote] Not sure where you saw this, but its likely someone with an engineering bias. Hense why Berkeley, Olin, CMC is so high, etc. It should be.... S+ Tier (Exceptional at everything, extremely resourced, global prestige): -Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Princeton (No glaring weaknesses) Yale S Tier (Exceptional at nearly everything, extremely resourced, global prestige): -Caltech (Amazing STEM but worse at humanities than MIT) -Duke (Very well rounded and perhaps greatest upside in S tier, but youngest of elite schools) -Columbia (Very well rounded but hurting from recent scandals, still benefits from being in NYC) -UChicago (Strong humanities and sciences but lacking in engineering) -UPenn (Very well rounded but perhaps too centered around Wharton that can create odd dynamic with the non-Wharton students) A+ Tier (Exceptional at many things, heavily resourced, national prestige): -Northwestern (Very well rounded, closest to being S tier) -Johns Hopkins (Pointy in strengths, perhaps too centered around medicine) -Dartmouth (Strong undergrad focus, but lacking strong research backing and global reputation of S tier) -Cornell (Good at STEM and niche programs like agriculture, but lagging in other traditional fields and a bit weaker in undergrad focus) -Brown (Weakest academically of ivies | Not quite as undergrad focused as Dartmouth and not quite an S tier research institution) -Williams and Amherst (Most elite liberal arts educations, minimal global prestige compared to others in this tier) A Tier (Exceptional at many things, well resourced, national prestige): Berkeley- (Academically phenomenal all around similar to S+ tier and high global prestige, but significantly hurt in lack of resources and attention for undergrads, VERY weak undergrad admissions) -Vanderbilt (Needs to cement itself as a top research institution, closest to being A+ tier) -Rice (Strong undergrad focus and very well resourced, but lacking global reputation) -UMich (Well rounded with strong research, lacking undergrad attention, Very weak undergrad admissions) -Georgetown (Incredibly elite for humanities, but severely lacking in STEM and could use more financial resources) -Notre Dame (Superb financial resources, but limited research excellence) -Washington University in St. Louis (Great financial resources, but pointy in strengths towards medicine/science) -UCLA (Strong research, but struggles with undergraduate resources, Very Weak undergrad admissions) -Carnegie Mellon (Inverse Georgetown: strong STEM, severely lacking in humanities despite strong points in arts and theatre) -Emory (Best Nursing, Public health programs in the country, good business as well) Swarthmore and Pomona- 2nd best LACs [/quote] Why split up the LACs? they're equally resourced.[/quote] They're not as prestigious. [/quote] Then don’t include any of them. Most people would not put Williams and Amherst anywhere near the schools you ranked. Their student quality is also worse.[/quote] +1, it’s quite silly to put Williams on the same tier as Berkeley. No offense to Williams, good small school, but Berkeley blows it out of the water on impact in academia, course availability, and research output. I don’t know why people try to merge these lists together.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics