Reply to Notre Dame Drops ‘Catholic Mission’ Language From Staff Values

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Notre Dame Drops ‘Catholic Mission’ Language From Staff Values"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have a kid there as well.  The Catholic mission permeates the entire campus from his doem rector, dorm mass, Catholic focused service work, to praying at the grotto weekly. The school has a priest as President.  The student section goes wild like it is a rockstar for Father Pete at football games.  When I was at mass, [b]there were probably 30 college girls in mantillas and jeans.[/b]

Yet he appreciates his friends of different faiths  - his roommate is not Catholic. There are also a wide variety of opinion from conservative Catholics to liberal Catholics. This is all healthy.

I don’t think we need to create alarm over Notre Dame losing its Catholic way. For those lucky enough to attend (I am not an alum), seems like a great place.[/quote]

Oh my. I'm an alum and never saw anyone in mantillas. I wonder if the student body is becoming more conservative?[/quote]

Yeah -- I have a kid there and also find this concerning.

Mantillas on old ladies are charming.  Matillas on young women--> future trad wives.  Yuck.[/quote]

I am the poster who saw these girls and I am sorry I brought it up. As I said, I have no idea if they were students vs outside tour group. I can only say they were young college-aged women who were respectfully attending mass. I have never worn a mantilla and thought it was a nice reminder that all manner of faiths are welcome. I also didn’t talk with them to know their beliefs on anything.    Wasn’t this the whole issue in the Abrego Garcia case: that people assumed he was a gang member by what he was wearing? Please don’t assume they will be trad wife’s bc they wear mantillas. Certainly we can all put up with the sartorial choices of others without any need to judge.  [/quote]

Abrego Garcia was wearing a t-shirt and baseball hat.  It was not about what he was wearing.  It was about pure racism. Late the administration called it a "clerical error". Then, later,  tattoos that were lazing photoshopped onto his hand and Trump trotted those images out as truth. A full breakdown of our rule of law.

Have no thoughts about mantillas, but no .. the Albrego Garcia case was not about what he was wearing. [/quote]

If you read the DHS statements, Abrego Garcia’s arrest was absolutely pinned on what he was wearing.  DHS said this: “When arrested, [Abrego Garcia] was wearing a sweatshirt with roles of money covering the ears, mouth, and eyes of presidents on various currency denominations. This is a known MS-13 gang symbol of see no evil, hear no evil, say no evil.”

[/quote]

Yes. And they lied. He was wearing a bulls hat and a sweatshirt commonly sold by FashionNova.

when cops arrest people especially when they profile people, they make up reasons.

All charges were dropped because the prosecutor determined they profiled him and had no reasonable suspicion, so they got all butt hurt and handed him over to ICE where another court found that he could not be deported.

Which means he was document, he never committed a crime and he was here legally.

He was profiled for the color of his skin but the cops said... well he was wearing a Bulls hat and we all know gang members love the bulls. Which is bull. [/quote]

That is my point. Abrego Garcia shouldn't have been profiled.  Leta dtopnkaiing assumptions about people. Lets not assume these girls will be trad wives and drop it.[/quote]

I agree that we should not profile anybody but Bulls jersey has nothing to do with gangs and a matilla on a young girls probably has a correlation. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics