Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Volleyball
Reply to "Metro vs Paramount (vs other top clubs)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] While it is still TBD as to how all of this will play at, Paramount and Metro's dominance in the Region is going to have a significant and deleterious impact on the other clubs in the area. Paramount's 2nd teams have already earned bids to Regionals and have proven themselves to be very competitive, and Metro is obviously now trying to do the same thing with their national teams. The pull that each of these clubs have is likely to lead to other CHRVA clubs losing even more of their talent. It wouldn't suprise me if CHRVA Bid Regionals quickly turn into Paramount and Metro's 1st and 2nd teams consistently finishing some combination of 1st-4th, leaving other clubs in the area with limited bid opportunities. The simple reality is that these two clubs have clearly separated themselves from the other clubs in the area. This is a situation that happened in many other USAV regions already. History in those regions show that when 2 top clubs attempt to create more teams at lower levels that most of the best players will choose other clubs 1s teams over being on the 2nd or 3rd team at the expanding club. This is especially true where clubs have historically had issues with player retention and/or little history of players moving up through the team levels. Even in the most top heavy regions with well known clubs (A5 for example) there are very few instances of 2 clubs consistently taking the top 4 places. Metro doesn't have issues with player retention, but also does not have a history of players moving up between their regional/travel teams. That could change but we need to wait for a couple of years to see if they are able to develop their players to the point where there is significant movement between their two travel teams. Paramount has a history of both player retention issues and has not proven the ability to develop players in a way that moves them from lower teams to their upper team. It also takes several years for any changes to become apparent. In 2023 Paramount added U14, U12, U13, U15 in 2024 and U16 in 2025. In all those cases, in the first year the added teams were ranked well below the 1s teams at many other top clubs (avg. ranking ~900). Of those teams, the 14-2 did make bids in 2023 but wasn't competitive, finishing tied for last place. In 2024, the 12-2 didn't make it to bids in 2024, the 13-2 finished sixth and didn't win bid via the tournament (they may have gotten an reallocation bid later on, not sure). The 15-2s finished tied for last and didn't get a bid. In 2025, the 16-2 finished tied for last as well. The next year, most of those teams did get better and some did earn bids. However, other posters have proven that that growth came largely by recruiting from other clubs. Even with the approach of trying to recruit away from other clubs, in virtually all of the ages the Paramount 2s team finished below other non-Metro clubs 1s teams. So they are getting more talent and getting bids, but they aren't surpassing the 1s teams at other bid-level clubs. While Metro is generally better regarded and has a longer track record of success they will likely run into many of the same issues Paramount had in launching their 2s teams. The first year will be hard, then we'll have to watch to see what happens. If my DD had an offer from a 2s team at a good club and an offer for Metro 2s or Paramount 3s, we might think about it. But if she had a 1s offer from a club that historically has performed well, I'm not sure we would her to give up a year of her club to be the test case for if one of those new teams was going to work. [/quote] Very insightful! On the Va side what clubs do you think fall in the “historically performed well” category? Do you think the economy will have any impact on turnout? If your DD had an offer from Metro and Paramount, which one would you take? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics