Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "How important is "culture" fit or "lifestyle" fit when attempting to make partner in Biglaw?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP, you sound like a weirdo[/quote] I mean, I work in biglaw, doesn't that describe most folks that don't leave and try to stick around? :) With that being said, not a big fan of the almost name calling in this thread. I don't think it's necessary to call someone an "aspie" or that they're a "weirdo" if they exhibit behaviors that some might find strange when they're asking for advice navigating a situation. I wouldn't say that I'm OCD about my daily routine as long as I can get a work out in at some point. Willful misunderstanding of other people's lives? Apologies if I offended you, I meant to include this earlier but I know for a fact that the information in my first post applies to the partners I work for/in my group. I agree with you it was a mistake to potentially paint ALL the partners at my firm with the same brush.[/quote] I said weirdo, not aspie. The fact you are this weird probably shows through and yes that could hurt your ability to make partner, develop business, etc. Not owning a second home is the least of your concerns.[/quote] The "aspie" comment was directed at the other posters not you. In any case, thank you for your feedback, it is much appreciated.[/quote] I didn’t say “aspie” ask an insult. I am saying I think you are high functioning but on the autism spectrum. If you think that’s an insult maybe you have failed to seek out a diagnosis. [/quote] My apology then. I was mistaken in taking it as in insult, I'm used to seeing/reading folks use that form of the term more in a negative sense. And again, appreciate everyones feedback here. If the general consensus is that I have no chance at making partner at my current firm or in "biglaw" in general, I'll reach out to the few firms that have expressed interest in having me join that are more boutique level / midlaw to see if my chances would be better there and what they potentially have to offer. I'll be up for partner at my current firm at the end of 2027 and will also continue to try there, but maybe I'll pump the brakes slightly to focus on other opportunities.[/quote] I think you’re misunderstanding. You’re fixating on nonsense. No one cares if you have a vacation house. But they do care if your level of weird is spilling over so much that they can’t put you in front of a client. Just try to keep it together a little bit better and I’m sure you’ll be fine. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics