Reply to An insane surrogacy story

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "An insane surrogacy story"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What did the rich person do?

I’m not going to read a long article. Usually these things can be summarized in a few sentences. [/quote]

Everything possible to try to wreck the life of the surrogate who experienced still birth while hospitalized. Suing her, cutting off payments, leaving surrogate on the hook for hospital bills (including weeks of inpatient monitoring). Bi wants her to go to jail, lose her own son, etc.

Also mentions that placental problems are due to the dna of the embryo and this isn’t routinely disclosed to the GC. Gestational diabetes, placenta previa, abruption, etc.

Bi also said her next GC was perfect, despite the fact that her GC experienced severe bleeding necessitating an emergency hysterectomy and ICU admission with intubation.

[/quote]

Alternative version: GC lied to IPs about her living situation and concealed material information from them throughout pregnancy, including a placental abruption.  She then made a series of poor decisions that killed the fetus.  [/quote]

The evidence at hand — which seems to be substantial and is detailed in the article — does not support this whatsoever. [/quote]

Read the complaint that the IPs filed.  It tells a very different story.  [/quote]

Complaints are meaningless. Crazy people can allege anything in a complaint and often do. It is nothing approaching actual evidence.

The Wired article meticulously picks through the evidence. Nothing supports the idea that the IP was anything other than fully in the wrong. The court losses and lawyers that have walked away are also significant indicators of the weaknesses of the IP’s claims. [/quote]

IP is represented by a partner at BakerHostetler.  This isn’t some silly ambulance chasing lawsuit.  [/quote]

No she is not. She's represented by Doug Rochen, a plaintiff's lawyer who took the case on a contingency fee. And I will guarantee you that the case will never go anywhere because in order for it to go anywhere Rochen knows that he needs the surrogate dropped as a defendant so that he can call her as a witness so that he can effectively go after the hospital - because that's where the money is. And Bi is never going to agree to that.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics