Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not a troll and not expecting anyone to explain this to me, but just putting it out there that I have no idea why this stuff looks bad for Freedman.

From what I understand from what a poster just posted a few comments ago JB did say that Sloane told him justin sexually assaulted Blake, then he came back and said I didn’t mean sexual assault I meant sexual harassment. Then he came back and said never mind. She never said anything. I read that in the complaint.

I’m sorry, but this guy sounds unhinged and it also definitely sounds like Sloane told him crappy stuff about Justin including allegations of SH at best, at worst SA but something spooked him and now he he is backtracking. How this bad for Freedman?

Again, not really expecting an answer but just saying that’s when I’m reading from somebody not going straight to the documents but just reading this thread. [/quote]

It’s just the Blake bots trying to make things sound good for her/hope something happens to Freedman.  Personally, I think this is going to blow up the other way, as JV has given tons of documents to  The WF side and said all kinds of things.  Using a recovering addict who has already been proven to be a liar is a desperation move.  The text they think is so important isn’t even dated or shown in full.[/quote]

Is the case going to get better for you guys from here or is the circle just going to keep constricting tighter and tighter?

* That August 7th email talking about the final plan accepted for Wallace to accomplish, which included encouraging tiktokers, instagrammers, Xers, and other CCers to run negative stories about Lively seemed horrible for you to me.  I understand Wallace has sworn that he did none of this, but this appears less and less believable to me given that email and the fact that he made $1,000/day for 90 days, claims to have had no employees or anyone working for him, and only produced 130 pages of docs.  If you're just "monitoring" social media and not manipulating it or getting employees/subcontractors to do same, you better have a ton of written reports you're distributing daily or weekly to show wtf you've been doing to earn that nut.

* Ferrer clearly appears to dislike Baldoni after all, despite everything Baldoni did to make this amicable.  What did Baldoni do to deserve that I wonder?  Does it have something to do with filming that scene?

* Not sure Vituscka will be a huge help to Lively, but he's definitely not going to be the hidden weapon Baldoni was hoping for when they had Freedman's buddy Geragos representing him.  Why didn't Freedman even ask him a single question about what Vituscka meant about the SA text before he included it in Baldoni's complaint as the single piece of evidence relied on re Sloane's alleged defamation of Baldoni/WF?  That's terrible lawyering.

*More witnesses still to come out of the woodwork during depositions seem unlikely to be good for Baldoni, including Slate and Sony execs.  Meanwhile, was that meaningless excerpt from Lively's deposition the best Baldoni got from it?

I guess this could still turn around during depositions if Ferrer and Slate say their treatment wasn't that bad but their coloring of it was influenced a lot by Lively.  But from where I'm at, things have been getting worse and worse for Baldoni/WF over the last 2 weeks, while Baldoni has been off on vacation again in Switzerland lol.  Okay, Jason -- enjoy that while your world burns etc.  
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics