Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not a troll and not expecting anyone to explain this to me, but just putting it out there that I have no idea why this stuff looks bad for Freedman. From what I understand from what a poster just posted a few comments ago JB did say that Sloane told him justin sexually assaulted Blake, then he came back and said I didn’t mean sexual assault I meant sexual harassment. Then he came back and said never mind. She never said anything. I read that in the complaint. I’m sorry, but this guy sounds unhinged and it also definitely sounds like Sloane told him crappy stuff about Justin including allegations of SH at best, at worst SA but something spooked him and now he he is backtracking. How this bad for Freedman? Again, not really expecting an answer but just saying that’s when I’m reading from somebody not going straight to the documents but just reading this thread. [/quote] It’s just the Blake bots trying to make things sound good for her/hope something happens to Freedman. Personally, I think this is going to blow up the other way, as JV has given tons of documents to The WF side and said all kinds of things. Using a recovering addict who has already been proven to be a liar is a desperation move. The text they think is so important isn’t even dated or shown in full.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics