Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Princeton admissions info and what it shows about legacy and athletic recruits"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I went to Princeton and they’ve been clear that athletes do better after college than non athletes (higher income, more successful). It’s not all about test scores.[/quote] +1 I have three kids in high school. The 2 who are just ok athletes have near perfect grades and test scores. The third child is an outstanding athlete but has the lower grades and scores of the three. Why? Because she spends about 25 hours a week on her sport. I guarantee if she didn’t do that, she’d have higher grades and scores. [/quote] +1 I'd take a dedicated recruitable college athlete ( Top 50 D1/high academic D3) with a 1300+ SAT over an unhooked applicant with ok ECs and higher test score every time.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
