Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Is this a valid definition of safety, target, and reach?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Rising sophomore DD came home at the end of last year and told me her school's counselors consider a school a safety, target, or reach based on the student's individual chances of getting in (mostly GPA and SAT/ACT-based). E.g., a target is where you have between a 25-75 chance of getting in. I've never heard anyone phrase it this, and it feels off to me, because, for example, MIT is a reach for everyone no matter how high their scores, yes? I feel like it it'll give her and her classmates a too-optimistic view of where they might be admitted?[/quote] Reach: less than 20% acceptance rate, there are levels of reach as well, because 5% is different than 19% and if your kid has 1580/4.0UW/10+ APs at a 15-19% place, they are more likely than someone with a 1480/3.75UW/6 AP. Target: acceptance rates between 20-50% and your kid is at/above 50% for stats. I like to include at least one target where your kid is at/above 75-80% for stats. Safety: Acceptance rates of 50%+, your kid is at/above 75-80%, basically your kid will get in if they show interest. And yes, MIT is reach for everyone unless your parents are famous and you have the stats to get in. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics