Reply to The rigor of LACs

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "The rigor of LACs"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Very few LACs are anywhere near the rigor of top engineering universities. That's what happens when your school is mostly "soft" subjects.[/quote]

Do you care to explain why when adjusted for size SLACs send a far higher percentage of their students to PhD programs than the schools which you obsessively adore? [/quote] The schools PP adores give their students the option to go into highly lucrative industry careers or grad school. With a LAC, there is pretty much no choice, so of course more go to grad school. That's not necessarily a success.[/quote]

That is funny, wildly incorrect but funny.

Top SLACs place as well or better into highly lucrative careers as well or better than any top university major for major. Ironically many also place very well for CS and Swarthmore and Mudd engineering grads are highly sought after. The universities that they adore place  a lot of engineers which skews their numbers.[/quote]nI can believe this for Mudd, but I'll need evidence for Swarthmore being a FAANG target[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics